|
Venezuela's Chavez Defeated in Bid for Indefinite Re-Election, Sweeping Reform |
|
Monday, 03 December 2007 |
|
CARACAS, Venezuela — Humbled by his first electoral defeat ever, President Hugo Chavez said Monday he may have been too ambitious in asking voters to let him stand indefinitely for re-election and endorse a huge leap to a socialist state. "I understand and accept that the proposal I made was quite profound and intense," he said after voters narrowly rejected the sweeping constitutional reforms by 51 percent to 49 percent. Opposition activists were ecstatic as the results were announced shortly after midnight — with 88 percent of the vote counted, the trend was declared irreversible by elections council chief Tibisay Lucena. Some shed tears. Others began chanting: "And now he's going away!" Without the overhaul, Chavez will be barred from running again in 2012. Foes of the reform effort — including Roman Catholic leaders, media freedom groups, human rights groups and prominent business leaders — said it would have granted Chavez unchecked power and imperiled basic rights. Chavez told reporters at the presidential palace that the outcome of Sunday's balloting had taught him that "Venezuelan democracy is maturing." His respect for the verdict, he asserted, proves he is a true democratic leader. "From this moment on, let's be calm," he proposed, asking for no more street violence like the clashes that marred pre-vote protests. "There is no dictatorship here." A senior U.S. official hailed Chavez's referendum defeat Monday as a victory for the country's citizens who want to preserve democracy and prevent Chavez from having unchecked power. "We felt that this referendum would make Chavez president for life, and that's not ever a welcome development," U.S. Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns told reporters in Singapore. "In a country that wants to be a democracy, the people spoke, and the people spoke for democracy and against unlimited power." Chavez, who was briefly ousted in a failed 2002 coup, blamed the loss on low turnout among the very supporters who re-elected him a year ago with 63 percent of the vote. Seven in 10 eligible voters cast ballots then. This time it was just 56 percent.
Conservative Bloggers Comments:
I am very relieved that Hugo Chavez will be gone in 2012 (barring any further non election related coup attempts). Let's not be confused here, this election was a peaceful coup attempt in Venezuela. The constitutional amendments that were proposed were chocked full of redistribution of wealth from individual and corporate to that of the state. Chavez was looking to use that wealth to buy the votes of those who would be the recipients in order to proclaim himself PResident (dictator) for life. It almost worked. Thankfully the majority of Venezuelans saw this effort for what it was and rejected it. Some of the current efforts of the Liberals in the US resemble (though in a much more subtle way) the objectives of Hugo Chavez. Just last week Bill CLinton while speaking in support of Hillary had some scary socialistic tax thoughts with regard to the wealthy during time of war. We already know Hillary support socialism through her health care plan. These Socialistic thoughts are becoming the main ideas of the Democrats. Do you support socialism?
| | No comments for this item |
|
Last Updated ( Monday, 03 December 2007 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Monday, 26 November 2007 |
|
By Conservative Blogger
Once in a while there are slow news days and I just can't find a particular topic that gets me motivated to write. Today began like that. I later ready the Oprah article and took a stance on that topic. Later this morning I received an e-mail touting the validty of the 9/11 conspiracy theory. I immediately shot back an e-mail to the sender letting him know that I thought they he was a tinfoil hat wearing nutjob. I then thought I would take a moment to write a quick note for future nutjobs that might visit the Noodle. The Conservative Noodle is not a clearing house for mental ward wannabes (apologies to the lefties who think I am nuts) nor will it ever be. At least some form of IQ is required to carry on a political conversation and to have a coherent thought or two. People who truly believe that 9/11 was some government sponsored "inside job" are wackos and are not welcome here (not that I can control it). I consider conspiracy theorists akin to the terrorists who actually carried out the 9/11 attacks. I hope this is one area where left and right can agree that there will always be fringe weirdos and the conspiracy theorists are the latest fruitcakes.
| | No comments for this item |
|
Last Updated ( Monday, 26 November 2007 )
|
|
|
Oprah Winfrey to Stump for Obama |
|
Monday, 26 November 2007 |
|
DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) - Oprah Winfrey will join Democrat Barack Obama again on the campaign trail, this time visiting the early contest states of Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina.
The popular talk show host and media mogul plans to visit Iowa on Saturday, Dec. 8, with stops in Des Moines and Cedar Rapids. The following day, she'll travel to Columbia, S.C. Later that day, she'll visit New Hampshire, but a location hadn't been announced Monday morning. This isn't the first time Oprah has lent her star power to the Illinois senator. In September, she rolled out the red carpet for Obama at a gala fundraiser in California that brought in about $3 million for his campaign. Winfrey is a well-known fan of Obama, calling him "my favorite guy" and "my choice" on CNN's "Larry King Live" last year before he announced he would seek the presidency. In a news release announcing the events, Obama's campaign said tickets to the Iowa events will be given first to precinct captains, then campaign volunteers, then to supporters and undecided caucus-goers. It said volunteers can be guaranteed a ticket by completing a four- hour volunteer shift or attending local caucus training before the event.
Original Story
Conservative Bloggers Comments:
I personally do not care for celebrities who use their time on the air to pitch political agendas to their audiences. This is not just about Oprah or democrats, but rather all celebrities in general. Rosie being the biggest example of what not to do. Rosie who is a very funny and talented lady has used her position to preach about politics and has alienated many people because of her actions. She is the most polarizing of examples, but I think it is a good place to start. Oprah risks hurting her reputation by talking politics and backing any particular candidate for election. Celebrities often make the mistake that their popularity somehow gives them the right or duty to push their political ideas on us. In fact, just the opposite is true. We don't care (for the most part) and don't want to know who you are backing in the next election. People watch oprah to learn and to be entertained, not to be preached to about politics. Many fans love you Oprah but unfortunately the only way celebrities ever learn is when audiences excercise their right to choose and switch the channel.
| | No comments for this item |
|
Last Updated ( Monday, 26 November 2007 )
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>
|
| Results 1 - 8 of 12 |